Governors are rascals
The
president of Nigeria has always come under intense public scrutiny. His actions,
or inactions, often translate into any sense of failures, or the general sense
of accomplishment attached to Nigeria.
If the Eagles win an international competition,
then the president is doing well. If there is a fire in the Alaba international
Market, the president is summoned to intervene, sometimes by wide public
outcry. No one considers that the Alaba International Market falls under the
municipal oversight of the Ojo local government in Lagos, which should, under
normal circumstances, provide the fire and emergency services; market security,
and enforce safety codes.
These duties of the local or municipal government,
are sometimes taken over by the states, and so functions and responsibilities
of the tiers of government blur so much that the average citizen has no idea
where the recourse to public services lie. To whom should we go to demand
proper public education for our children? Who should carry away our garbage?
Who fixes the gutters or the streets lights? Who collects property tax, and to
what end?
These questions lie at the heart, or let us simply
say, reflect the deformity of our federal system, and has been at the heart of
our schizophrenic constitution, which seems to have been conceived and written
by people with bi-polar disorder.
In any case, in most instances, Nigerians think
that the power of the president of Nigeria is absolute. Recently, some people
have even started to call on president Buhari to “probe” the activities of
their state governors. It is true that the President of the republic has
enormous powers, but under a democratic dispensation, his powers does not
include interrogating, probing, or sanctioning the governor of a state. In actual
fact, the President has the same powers as the governor of a state except that
the state is a smaller territory within the federation.
The Federal constitution which established the
powers of the federal government equally established the powers of the state
government, to the extent of endowing each state with a unicameral legislature.
It is incumbent on these legislatures to probe and sanction the executive
excess of the governors. What has often not been clear to many Nigerians, who
are generally ignorant about the functions of the state, is that each tier of
government under the federal system is independent and has laws. But while the
president is often the subject of intense scrutiny, very often, the other tiers
seem to be mere appendages to power.
There is a backdrop to this: the military
governments unified legislative and executive functions, and basically
established a command structure of state that reflected the military hierarchy,
in which the states were in fact governed as appendages of the central
government. States depend mostly on “federal allocations.” Nigerians continue
to look at the center as the absolute source of national power and political
action.
They overlook the significant agency of the states
and their governors, and in focusing utmost attention on the presidency miss
the point of the responsibility of governance at the 2nd tier. Indeed, since
1999, many of the states have had ineffective legislatures. They have mostly
been rubber stamp Assemblies. In a democracy, the most powerful arm of
government is the legislature. But in Nigeria, it has remained dormant because
we tend generally to imagine power as a person. We also tend to elect,
especially at the state levels, people of doubtful quality and pedigree to the
Assemblies.
This certainly is the case in Imo state. For
instance, we have not recreated the powerful House of Assembly of the 2nd
republic under the Atuloma Speakership, and a House Majority under the whip of
Nze HSK Osuji, and the Minority whip, the then young, fiery lawyer, Mike
Ahamba, whose contributions and debates were given equal airing in the
“Assembly Reports” of both the Imo State Broadcasting Service (IBS) and the Statesman
– a quality regional paper of those years owned by the Imo state government.
Perhaps it is the absence of really powerful local
media oversight in these places, but the effect is that since 1999, many of the
governors elected from these states have been rascals – more so in Imo –where
it seems public opinion has never counted for much. For instance, a man who was
once held for armed robbery made a serious bid for power – to be governor of
Imo. The current governor, Mr. Anayo Okorocha, has very little pedigree. You
may hear him now and then claim that he had two private jets before becoming
governor of Imo State. Okorocha was not a trust fund kid.
He was neither an Anyaehie nor Akwiwu or some known
quantity of the old money from that region of Imo, none of whom owned private
jets in any case. As the late Ikemba Nnewi used to say, the likes of Okorocha,
who taught in a second rate, unaccredited commercial school in the city of Jos
while some of us were already university undergraduates in the 1980s, must
somehow have suddenly found and planted a money-bearing tree behind his house,
to be able to afford private jets long before being governor of Imo. Either
that, or he has some shady past of which it is the duty of the EFCC to
investigate. But certainly, and what is rather clear is that as governor of Imo
state, Rochas Okorocha, great ally these days of the anti-corruption president,
has questions to answer about his tenure in Imo.
For the past four years of his administration, Mr.
Okorocha has illegally appropriated the funds of the Local governments of Imo
State, with the connivance of the leadership of the Imo State House of Assembly
under Uwajumogu, and defrauded the populace into thinking that he is providing
the children with “free education” – something already paid for by the federal
government. And you’d wonder how in the hell this is possible, given that Imo
has high literacy.
He has commissioned some rather poorly constructed
roads, over-inflated the contracts, and some of those who have questioned some
of these questionable contracts and expenditure of his government have
disappeared; the likes of Emenike Ihekweaba.
To top it all, the administration has been owing
public sector workers and pensioners a backlog of their salaries and pensions.
Last week, Imo workers finally rose in protest. They blockaded the Imo House of
Assembly and the State government house, demanding that their monies be paid,
and the ridiculous policy or move to commercialize parastatals by the Okorocha
government be reversed, and be not given legislative backing. It would seem
that the days of impunity may finally be coming to an end in places like Imo
state, and that serious attention will now be paid to those who govern at the
two other important tiers of government, where we have paid very little
attention.
The EFCC has commenced probing the former governor
of River state, Rotimi Amechi. It must also begin the probe of the Imo
administration under Okorocha. Let me therefore be clear: governors and local
government chairmen have also wasted, stolen, and misappropriated billions of
public funds in the last fifteen years.
The elected members of the Assemblies of these
states must be held accountable by the public, as the workers in Imo state have
been reported to do last week. Legislators who collude with the executive administrations
to deny workers their wages, and illegally seize local government funds that
should have been used for grassroots development, must be recalled by their
constituents. Unless the people insist, and hold elected leadership hostage and
accountable, the only dividend they will reap from democracy will be chaos and
tyranny. And every rascal who becomes governor will claim a free rein, and will
become, as most seem to have become, infected by the God-complex.